Quality and standards

Private framework for approval, oversight and improvement of AEES programmes and centres.

AEES quality arrangements apply to the qualifications it awards and the institutions it authorises to teach them. This is private institutional quality assurance: it replaces neither national authorisation to operate nor accreditation by a public authority.

Review cycle

  1. Approval: verification of identity, capacity, programme and evidence before authorisation.
  2. Delivery: compliance with the approved scope, student information and record keeping.
  3. Assessment: security of papers, candidate identity, marking and boards.
  4. Monitoring: review of outcomes, incidents, complaints and corrective actions.
  5. Renewal: fresh review before the published approval expiry date.

Possible outcomes

Review may result in approval, conditional approval, deferral pending evidence, refusal, suspension or withdrawal. The scope, duration, reasons and follow-up deadlines must be recorded in the decision.

Explore the quality framework

Documents and procedures

Move from principles to observable criteria

The framework, approval process, assessment controls and appeal routes each describe a distinct part of the quality system.

Read the framework