Approval verifies that an institution or programme has the conditions required to meet its commitments to learners. It combines documentary analysis, dialogue with teams and consideration of institutional context.
A four-stage process
- Scoping and admissibility — understand the project, confirm the scope of review and gather essential institutional information.
- Self-evaluation and evidence — describe practice, identify responsibilities and present documents demonstrating implementation.
- Review dialogue — explore key points with leadership, academic managers and relevant teams.
- Reasoned decision — specify scope, duration, any conditions and expected follow-up action.
A proportionate decision
Review takes account of the project’s nature, number of programmes, delivery methods and identified risks. Approval may include recommendations or conditions with a specific timetable.
Material reviewed
The file covers at least legal existence and local authorisations, governance, academic leadership, teaching staff, physical or digital resources, student information, assessment arrangements and data protection. A document referred to but not supplied cannot be treated as evidence.
Every adverse decision is explained. An appeal route independent of the initial review allows reconsideration of the process or evidence considered.